Skip the menu
betfuryalternative
Written by
The betfuryalternative team
What we do
Compares BetFury with crypto casinos like it on licence, ID checks, payouts, bonuses and own games, from published documents and two money tests of our own
Updated
11 September 2026

Left out, and added back

Who is missing from our BetFury alternatives list, and the reason for each

Seven brands sat on our left-out list at the start of September 2026. Three of them, TrustDice, Shuffle and Wild.io, are now in the listing because we read their own documents and licence records; four remain outside, each for a reason given here.

Advertisement150% match on deposit one
  • Deposit one150%
  • Maximum1.5 BTC + 100 free spins
  • Deposits two, three, four100% / 50% / 25%
  • Wageringabsent from the offer page
Register at VaveBought placement — the only one on the domain. Figures taken from vave.com/promotions on 24 August 2026. That page names no wagering multiple; the full bonus terms do. 18+.

Seven brands sat on our left-out list at the start of September 2026, and three of them have since moved into the listing: TrustDice, Shuffle and Wild.io. Four remain outside: Cloudbet, PlayAmo, Rakebit and Gamdom. A reader looking for crypto casinos like BetFury would reasonably expect to see most of these names, so we name them here with a reason for each rather than dropping them without a word.

Where each brand stands

Source: our reading log, 26 August to 8 September 2026.

BrandStatusWhat changed, or what is missing
TrustDiceadded to the listingCuraçao certificate OGL/2024/664/0280, Active; our own money test, May 2026
Shuffleadded to the listingCuraçao certificate OGL/2024/1337/0628, Active, read 8 September 2026; terms clause 5.2
Wild.ioadded to the listingCuraçao certificate OGL/2024/210/0198, Active; ID wording from its own pages
Cloudbetleft outa register record and one archived clause; withdrawal, coin and bonus terms not read
PlayAmoleft outthe site showed our reader a refusal page; no operator document read
Rakebitleft outevery figure we held came from review pages
Gamdomleft outnot listed at this time

The three we added

TrustDice. For a long time every TrustDice figure we held came from review pages, so we printed none. Two first-party sources changed that. The Curaçao certificate portal shows licence OGL/2024/664/0280, held by Satoshi Gaming Group N.V., status Active, read 26 August 2026, and the Anjouan register carries a second record for the brand. TrustDice is also one of our two real-money tests. In May 2026 its crypto withdrawals reached our wallet in 10 to 15 minutes each, and no ID was requested until our withdrawals added up to about 5,000 USDT. At that point the account went into review, a Veriff link followed, our passport passed on the fifth attempt, and a second document request came by email. With its own dice games, a sportsbook and the TXT token, TrustDice sits close to BetFury in what it offers.

Shuffle. Shuffle was out for the same reason as TrustDice: review pages only. On 8 September 2026 we read its own documents and its register entry. The certificate for shuffle.com names Natural Nine B.V., company number 160998, licence OGL/2024/1337/0628, granted 16 October 2024, status Active, and Shuffle's own licence page prints the same number and company. Clause 5.2 of its terms says an ID check may come at a threshold Shuffle sets “and in any event before your first withdrawal”. So Shuffle publishes no amount, but it does publish that the check comes before the first cash-out. It runs a sportsbook, in-house games and its own SHFL token.

Wild.io. Wild.io was left out while we held only two things for it. Its Curaçao certificate, OGL/2024/210/0198, shows Active (read 31 August 2026), and the Anjouan register lists the brand as well. Its own pages say identity documents may be requested at any time, possibly before the first withdrawal. It runs a sportsbook and in-house games. It is now in the listing, and that entry rests on those first-party sources.

The four still left out

Cloudbet. We hold two first-party things. Its Curaçao register record, OGL/2024/328/0599, showed Active when we re-checked it on 31 August 2026. Clause 18.1.1 of its terms, read in an archived copy on 26 August 2026, says ID can be required and asked for again, and names no amount. Its withdrawal terms, coin list and bonus terms were not read from its own pages. A withdrawal ceiling once recorded for Cloudbet came from other people's reviews, and we removed it. Cloudbet has run sports, esports and a casino since 2013, so it may well return once more of its own documents are read.

PlayAmo. When our reader opened playamo.com on 2 September 2026, every page came back as the same one-line refusal notice, with no links and no document behind it. That is a fact about our access, not about the brand, and we record it that way. The only first-party source we hold is a register entry: the Anjouan register lists playamo.com under ALSI-202508056-FI2, held by Novatrix SRL, status Valid, read 2 September 2026. That single number covers 67 domains. With no terms read, there is nothing to set beside BetFury.

Rakebit. Every Rakebit figure we ever held came from review pages written about the brand. Review figures are not a source here, so none is printed, and without the operator's own documents Rakebit stays out.

Gamdom. Gamdom is not in our listing. We have read parts of its terms and help centre from archived copies of its own pages (snapshot 9 August 2026, read 2 September 2026). Clause 4.1, for example, asks for every deposit to be wagered once before a withdrawal, bonus or no bonus, and the help centre says ETH and USDT are accepted on the ERC-20 network only. Those details stay on record; the brand stays off the list for now.

How a brand moves in

The route into the listing is the same for every operator, and TrustDice and Shuffle show it working. We read the operator's own documents and its licence record, write down the clause and the date, and set it beside BetFury on the same topics. Review pages never count toward that, however detailed they look. What a licence record can settle, and what it leaves open, is on the register page.

Being left out is not an accusation. Cloudbet and PlayAmo are outside because of what we could read, and Rakebit because of where its figures came from; none of that is a finding about how those operators treat players.

Being listed is not an endorsement either. A listed brand is one whose documents we could read, and only two operators have been tested with our own money: TrustDice and Vave. The rules behind all of this are on our method page, and every reading date is in the log on our About page.

Why is TrustDice now on the list?
Because we now hold first-party facts for it. Its Curaçao certificate, OGL/2024/664/0280, showed Active when we read it on 26 August 2026, and TrustDice is one of our two real-money tests, run in May 2026.
Why is Cloudbet not listed?
We hold its register record and one clause from an archived copy of its terms, 18.1.1, which names no amount. Its withdrawal, coin and bonus terms were not read from its own pages, and a ceiling once recorded for it came from other people's reviews and was removed.
Can a brand that was left out be added later?
Yes. TrustDice and Shuffle show how: once we read a brand's own documents and its licence record, with dates, it can move into the listing. Review pages never count toward that.